Boundaries don't mean anything if you don't enforce them - enforcement is where the rubber hits the road
Rosanne explains that setting boundaries without enforcement leaves both you and the other person unclear on expectations, making the boundary meaningless.
You must be crystal clear about why each boundary is important to you before you can effectively enforce it
Rosanne provides specific examples: knowing why it's important for your partner to show up to appointments, why you don't want your mother interfering in your baby timeline, and why you need your doctor to stop suggesting surrogacy.
Women on the fertility journey have a unique wake-up call and level of awareness that creates responsibility to show up with excellence as mothers
Rosanne explains that because becoming a mom wasn't easy for fertility journey women, they have special awareness of the gift and should use it to be better mothers rather than perpetuate limiting beliefs.
Set boundaries when things are calm, not in the heat of battle, because people can't listen when they're defensive
Rosanne explains that setting boundaries during conflict sets both parties up for misery because the other person will be too defensive or distracted to hear you properly.
Expecting people to be mind readers is a form of victimhood that reeks as bad as yesterday's catch rotting in the sun
Rosanne emphasizes that only immature high school girls expect people to guess what they want, and adults must communicate their boundaries clearly.
Once you start setting boundaries, expect others to start setting them with you - it's a two-way street
Rosanne notes this is why some people don't like setting boundaries - they don't want to be responsible for abiding by others' boundaries, and those who don't enforce their own are often the worst offenders of others'.
The aftermath is when the recipient gets to sit with, accept, or decline your boundary - this is when you must batten down the hatches
Rosanne explains the three possible responses: receptive/grateful acceptance, wrestling with their own conflict, or flat-out rejection or selective compliance.
Someone rejecting your boundary isn't personal - they may love you and simply decide their needs are more important
Rosanne gives the example of a partner who won't consider IVF for male factor infertility - you can love them but still choose to prioritize your desire for a baby, and vice versa.
Two things can be true at the same time - someone can love you and still reject your boundary for their own reasons
Rosanne explains this complex thinking using the IVF/male factor example, showing how both people can love each other but have incompatible boundaries that change their relationship roles.
When you can handle black and white boundary situations, you can better handle the gray areas
Rosanne uses the extreme IVF example to provide contrast and help women understand that once they grasp clear-cut situations, they can navigate more subtle boundary challenges.